If you experience problems with this email newsletter, read it online.
Berding | Weil Community Association ALERT Newsletter
Legal News and Comments for Community Association Boards and Managers Issue #26 • August 2009
The Three-Year Trap and Other Problems
with an Association's Records in Litigation
By Elizabeth J. Bassett, Esq.
E-mail correspondence between board members and the manager discussing roof leaks and what could be causing them. Letters to the community's developer asking it to fix the leaking windows some of the members have complained about. Meeting minutes that include discussions of the discolored and crumbling stucco on the association's buildings that persists despite routine maintenance by the association. Reports from a company hired by the association to look at the community's decks and determine why they leak into the units below. What do these documents have in common? They are all documents found in the records of associations that later turn up in the association's litigation against their community's developer for defects in construction.
These are documents that must be turned over to the developer once an association has initiated a construction defect action. These records can open potential statute of limitations defenses to the developer or provide the developer with opinions on the cause or repair of a construction problem that conflict with the association's expert. This can result in the association incurring additional attorney and expert fees or reduce the association's potential recovery to fix the construction problems. However, some advance planning in e way an association maintains its records and investigates potential construction defects can help an association avoid the pit-fall of creating documents in its own files that negatively impact its case.
Creating Potential Statute of Limitations Issues
As has been discussed in previous Community Association ALERT Newsletters, statutes of limitation generally set the time limit for bringing an action for deficiencies in construction. Once the limitations period has run, an association has likely lost its ability to bring a claim and recover any money for defects in construction. Statutes of "repose" set the outside time limit for bringing an action. The most common of these in a construction case is CCP 337.15 which provides that no action may be brought beyond 10 years from various trigger dates. Provisions of the California Civil Code also specify even shorter limitation periods on actions for defects in specific building components.
A number of factors determine which limitation period applies to a community association and whether that statute has run as to the whole community or just as to specific building components (such as landscaping, roofs or asphalt paving). These factors include when the original buyers signed the purchase agreements for their homes, when a developer turned over control of the board of directors, or when the association first became aware of problems in the construction of the community or parts of the community. Because of the complexity of determining what statute of limitations applies to a community and whether that statute has been triggered for all or particular portions of the project, specific statute of limitations questions should be answered by an attorney with experience in the area of construction defect actions.
The Three-Year Statute of Limitations
Unlike the various statutes of repose, there is another statute, unrelated to the age of an association or when the buildings within a community were "substantially completed". This is the three-year statute of limitations that begins to run once an association has actual knowledge that there is a defect in the construction of its project. Even if the association is well within statutes of repose based on the date of completion of its community or the date the developer relinquished control of the association's board, if a developer can show that the association had actual knowledge of a defect in a component of the construction more than three years before filing litigation the association could lose its claim for that component.
Quite often it is an association's own records that can create a defense that the three-year statute of limitations has passed as to specific building components. A defendant can argue that the date of e-mail correspondence or meeting minutes discussing roof leaks is when the three-year statute of limitations was triggered - even though the association may not have had any idea why the roofs were leaking or the asphalt was deteriorating. The association's attorney might counter that defense by arguing that general knowledge of some roof leaks may not equate with knowledge of the specific problem. However, the association could incur significant attorneys' fees in fighting a developer on this issue, and settlements may be greatly reduced if the developer is able to assert a defense based on the early "discovery" of building defects.
Creating Potentially Conflicting Opinions
Another potential problem with the association's records in litigation is possible conflicts. To support its construction defect action, the association will hire experts who will perform an investigation of the problems in the construction of the association's buildings and provide a report with opinions about the construction deficiencies in the building, how they should be repaired, and the cost of those repairs. If the association has records that contain conflicting opinions on these issues, the developer can use those documents to defend it. The developer can also call the association's expert's opinions into question by showing that another contractor or engineer had a different opinion as to the cause of a problem or had a cheaper or less extensive repair that they told the association would fix the problem.
In this case, the association's expert may have to spend additional time reviewing that contractor or engineer's report and showing why their opinion was incorrect or that they were working without the complete information that the association's expert has. This will cause the association to incur additional expert fees that may not otherwise have been necessary. It may also result in the developer offering the association less money in settlement if the developer believes it could show that the documents in the association's own file do not support the repairs required by the association's expert.

PREVIOUS ISSUES
QUESTION OF THE WEEK
Question:
"Can there be special rules for pets?"
Answer:
A policy on pets would be stated in the CC&Rs or the Rules.
Why Won't They Serve?
Homeowners won't volunteer for boards of directors of community associations—another nail in the coffin?
Community associations are corporations.
Their bylaws require management of the association by an elected board of directors…»
What You Don't Know...
When do Statutes of Limitation begin to run on Construction Claims?
Statutes of Limitation are intended to protect defendants from stale claims.
They are also traps for the unwary claimant.
If the time period expires before an appropriate claim is made, legal rights can be permanently lost…»
Are Apartments a Better Answer to the Housing Crisis?
Sometime in the early sixties, a large California developer opened its first development of condominiums for sale.
Even by the standards of the day, they were offered at rock bottom prices…»
Copyright ©2009 BERDING | WEIL
All Rights Reserved.
BERDING | WEIL LLP - 3240 Stone Valley Road West | Alamo, CA | 94507-1558 | P: 925.838.2090 | F: 925.820.5592 | Contact Us
This email has been sent to: ^Email^
You are receiving this email newsletter courtesy of BERDING | WEIL.
Please do not reply to this email. If you have any questions, please use our contact form or call 925.838.2090.
To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add publications@berding-weil.com to your address book and/or allow emails from berding-weil.com to pass through your automated anti-spam software or service.
If you do not wish to receive this email newsletter on a regular basis, please unsubscribe here.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Search
2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 500 | Walnut Creek, CA | 94596 | P: 925.838.2090 | F: 925.820.5592 | Contact Us
©2017 BERDING | WEIL LLP. All Rights Reserved | Website Development by CENTERGRAPHICS